Ward v. State

946 So. 2d 1267, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 868, 2007 WL 187891
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ward v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 946 So. 2d 33
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 2007·No. No. 1D06-2685·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because Appellant’s sentence is illegal, we reverse the trial court’s denial and remand for resen-tencing.

The points scored on Appellant’s sentencing scoresheet for prior offenses do not accurately reflect the points warranted by those offenses. We, therefore, reverse and remand for resentencing pursuant to a correctly calculated scoresheet.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BARFIELD, VAN NORTWICK and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. State, 946 So. 2d 1267, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 868, 2007 WL 187891 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

946 So. 2d 1267 (Ward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.