Walters v. Castle Village Owners Corp.

166 A.D.2d 316
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 23, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 166 A.D.2d 316 (Walters v. Castle Village Owners Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walters v. Castle Village Owners Corp., 166 A.D.2d 316 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Francis Pécora, J.), entered August 8, 1989, which, after a jury trial, found in favor of plaintiffs against defendants and awarded, on plaintiffs’ stipulation to accept damages in a reduced amount, the sum of $371,885, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

A jury verdict in favor of plaintiff will not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached its conclusion upon any fair interpretation of the evidence (Cornier v Spagna, 101 AD2d 141, 149). The jury could have reasonably concluded that defendants’ negligence in allowing an open, unsecured hole to exist in the storage room was a substantial and proximate cause of the accident. Plaintiffs testified that the hole was covered by a "headboard”, instead of a steel plate, as defendants believed to be the case. While there was conflicting testimony as to what was covering the hole and the length of time that the condition existed, the jury resolved the conflicts in favor of plaintiffs and the record presents no reason to disturb its verdict (Picciallo v Norchi, 147 AD2d 540). We decline to disturb the jury’s assessment of damages which is not so excessive or inadequate as to shock the conscience of the court (Graham v Murphy, 135 AD2d 326, 330). We have considered defendants’ remaining claims and find them to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trenca v. Culeton
59 A.D.3d 1098 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Warlan v. Vaughan
261 A.D.2d 260 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Shencavitz v. Bellafiore
254 A.D.2d 271 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Zito v. 241 Church Street Corp.
223 A.D.2d 353 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Societa Italiana Assicurazioni Transporti v. Keith Bell Associates, Inc.
216 A.D.2d 2 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Hyo Sik Kim v. Samsung America, Inc.
213 A.D.2d 290 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A.D.2d 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walters-v-castle-village-owners-corp-nyappdiv-1990.