Warlan v. Vaughan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Warlan v. Vaughan

261 A.D.2d 260, 687 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5469

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D.2d 260 (Warlan v. Vaughan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warlan v. Vaughan, 261 A.D.2d 260, 687 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered April 21, 1998, upon a jury verdict, awarding plaintiff the total sum of $13,260, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We perceive no basis to disturb the jury’s verdict as against the weight of the evidence. Fairly considered (see, Walters v Castle Vil. Owners Corp., 166 AD2d 316), the evidence permitted the jury to reach the verdict it did as to the extent of the damages flowing from defendant attorneys’ breach of their guaranty respecting the outcome of certain post-judgment proceedings in the underlying matrimonial litigation.

We have reviewed plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them to be unavailing. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Wallach and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered April 21, 1998, upon a jury verdict, awarding plaintiff the total sum of $13,260, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We perceive no basis to disturb the jury’s verdict as against the weight of the evidence. Fairly considered (see, Walters v Castle Vil. Owners Corp., 166 AD2d 316), the evidence permitted the jury to reach the verdict it did as to the extent of the damages flowing from defendant attorneys’ breach of their guaranty respecting the outcome of certain post-judgment proceedings in the underlying matrimonial litigation.

We have reviewed plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them to be unavailing. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Wallach and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D.2d 260, 687 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warlan-v-vaughan-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack