Shencavitz v. Bellafiore
This text of 254 A.D.2d 271 (Shencavitz v. Bellafiore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Newmark, J.), entered August 19, 1997, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, dismissed the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
A jury verdict will not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached its conclusion upon any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Walters v Castle Vil. Owners Corp., 166 AD2d 316). Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, a rational jury could have concluded that the defendants were not negligent.
The plaintiffs’ remaining contention is not preserved for appellate review (see, Burke v Santoro, 172 AD2d 579; Goldberg v Union Hardware Co., 162 AD2d 658). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D.2d 271, 678 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shencavitz-v-bellafiore-nyappdiv-1998.