Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc.

990 A.2d 724
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 12, 2010·No. 636 EAL 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of March 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in adopting and applying Restatement (Second) of Torts § 772(a), and holding that truthful statements could not form the basis of a claim for tortious interference with contractual relations?
*725 Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc., 990 A.2d 724 (Pa. 2010).

990 A.2d 724 (Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc.
20 A.3d 468 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)