Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc.

990 A.2d 724, 605 Pa. 407, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 435, 2010 WL 850152
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 12, 2010
DocketAppeal No. 636 EAL 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 990 A.2d 724 (Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc., 990 A.2d 724, 605 Pa. 407, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 435, 2010 WL 850152 (Pa. 2010).

Opinion

[408]*408 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of March 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in adopting and applying Restatement (Second) of Torts § 772(a), and holding that truthful statements could not form the basis of a claim for tortious interference with contractual relations?
Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc.
20 A.3d 468 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
990 A.2d 724, 605 Pa. 407, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 435, 2010 WL 850152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walnut-street-associates-inc-v-brokerage-concepts-inc-pa-2010.