Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc.
990 A.2d 724, 605 Pa. 407, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 435, 2010 WL 850152
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 12, 2010·No. Appeal No. 636 EAL 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[408]*408 ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of March 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Did the Superior Court err in adopting and applying Restatement (Second) of Torts § 772(a), and holding that truthful statements could not form the basis of a claim for tortious interference with contractual relations?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc., 990 A.2d 724, 605 Pa. 407, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 435, 2010 WL 850152 (Pa. 2010).
990 A.2d 724 (Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc.
20 A.3d 468 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)