Commonwealth v. Hart
This text of 990 A.2d 724 (Commonwealth v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[407]*407 ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of March 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether a person who offers a child a ride without previously obtaining the permission of a parent of the child, but who otherwise lacks criminal intent to harm the child, may be convicted of luring a child into a motor vehicle under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 2910?
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County solely for the trial court to appoint counsel for Petitioner to represent him in this appeal if he desires such representation. In their briefs, the parties are to specifically address the applicability of the Superior Court decisions in Commonwealth v. Adamo, 431 Pa.Super. 529, 637 A.2d 302 (1994) and Commonwealth v. Figueroa, 436 Pa.Super. 569, 648 A.2d 555 (1994). Jurisdiction is retained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
990 A.2d 724, 605 Pa. 406, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-hart-pa-2010.