Wallace v. Jacobson

S.D. New York

Wallace v. Jacobson

DecidedNovember 4, 2020

Docket7:18-cv-02905

StatusUnknown

This text of Wallace v. Jacobson (Wallace v. Jacobson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wallace v. Jacobson, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARK WALLACE, Petitioner, 18 CIVIL 2905 (VB) -against- JUDGMENT CATHERINE JACOBSON, Respondent.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated November 4, 2020, the R&R is adopted as the opinion of the Court, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York November 4, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: K (MAngeo Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARK WALLACE, Petitioner, 18 CIVIL 2905 (VB) -against- JUDGMENT CATHERINE JACOBSON, Respondent.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated November 4, 2020, the R&R is adopted as the opinion of the Court, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York November 4, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: K (MAngeo Deputy Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Wallace v. Jacobson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-jacobson-nysd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack