Walker v. State

203 So. 3d 192, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15932
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 2016·No. No. 4D16-434·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114 (Fla.2000); Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000); Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979). Affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to raise issues concerning the voluntariness of his plea in a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The notice of appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction to rule on appellant’s subsequently-filed pro se motion to withdraw plea. Copeland v. State, 867 So.2d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (citing McCray v. State, 840 So.2d 274, 275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)).

Affirmed

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. State, 203 So. 3d 192, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15932 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

203 So. 3d 192 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wolter v. State
219 So. 3d 852 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Jilek v. State
212 So. 3d 499 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Flores v. State
211 So. 3d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)