McCray v. State
This text of 840 So. 2d 274 (McCray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kevis McCRAY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nan Ellen Foley, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
*275 PER CURIAM.
We affirm as to all issues raised by appellant. In the third issue appellant argues that this case should be remanded to the trial court for a ruling on appellant's motion to withdraw his plea in three separate cases.
The notice of appeal filed in this case divested the trial court of jurisdiction to enter any further rulings, including appellant's motion to withdraw plea. We, accordingly, affirm this issue without prejudice to any right appellant might have to raise this issue in any motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Wilson v. State, 814 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
AFFIRMED.
WARNER, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
840 So. 2d 274, 2003 WL 141589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccray-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.