Jilek v. State

212 So. 3d 499, 2017 WL 815375, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2772
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 2017·No. No. 4D15-3728·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. See Walker v. State, 203 So.3d 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s fifing of a timely rule 3.850 motion challenging the voluntariness of his plea. See Jackson v. State, 190 So.3d 98, 98 n.1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Affirmed.

Warner, Gross and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jilek v. State, 212 So. 3d 499, 2017 WL 815375, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2772 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

212 So. 3d 499 (Jilek v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Michael Jackson v. State
190 So. 3d 98 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Walker v. State
203 So. 3d 192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)