Jilek v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jilek v. State

212 So. 3d 499, 2017 WL 815375, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2772

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 2017

DocketNo. 4D15-3728

StatusPublished

This text of 212 So. 3d 499 (Jilek v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jilek v. State, 212 So. 3d 499, 2017 WL 815375, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2772 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. See Walker v. State, 203 So.3d 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s fifing of a timely rule 3.850 motion challenging the voluntariness of his plea. See Jackson v. State, 190 So.3d 98, 98 n.1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Affirmed.

Warner, Gross and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. See Walker v. State, 203 So.3d 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s fifing of a timely rule 3.850 motion challenging the voluntariness of his plea. See Jackson v. State, 190 So.3d 98, 98 n.1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Affirmed.

Warner, Gross and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 So. 3d 499, 2017 WL 815375, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jilek-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack