Michael Jackson v. State
This text of 190 So. 3d 98 (Michael Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. . Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant challenging the vol-untariness of his plea through a timely collateral motion. .See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. 1
. We decline to consider the trial court’s order denying appellant's motion to withdraw plea because it was entered after the notice of appeal was filed, at which point the trial court lacked jurisdiction to proceed. Also, no notice of appeal places that order before this court. Smith v. State, 113 So.3d 110, 111 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 So. 3d 98, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4277, 2015 WL 1360792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-jackson-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.