Walker v. State
770 So. 2d 226, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13772, 2000 WL 1580516
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 701 So. 2d 1258 →
Opinion
James Walker (“defendant”) appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. As correctly conceded by the State, the defendant’s sentence under Chapter 95-182 is illegal. See State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999). Therefore, we reverse the order denying postconviction relief and remand Walker’s case for resentencing. See Scruggs v. State, 761 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Higgs v. State, 761 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
[227]*227Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walker v. State, 770 So. 2d 226, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13772, 2000 WL 1580516 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
770 So. 2d 226 (Walker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Thompson
750 So. 2d 643 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Higgs v. State
761 So. 2d 1227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Scruggs v. State
761 So. 2d 1265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)