Walker v. Boston & Maine Railroad
128 Mass. 8, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 153
Opinion
The cause of action in each of these cases was the misplacement of a switch through the negligence of a fellow-servant of the plaintiff’s intestate. Farwell v. Boston & Worcester Railroad, 4 Met. 49. Gilman v. Eastern Railroad, 10 Allen, 233. Judgments on the verdicts.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walker v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 128 Mass. 8, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 153 (Mass. 1879).
128 Mass. 8 (Walker v. Boston & Maine Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dixon v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.
111 N.W. 200 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1907)
Sofield v. Guggenheim Smelting Co.
46 A. 711 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1900)
Rittenhouse v. Wilmington Street-Railway Co.
26 S.E. 922 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)
Minot
41 N.E. 63 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Miller v. Coffin
36 A. 6 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1895)
Moody v. Hamilton Manufacturing Co.
34 N.E. 185 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
Toner v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
31 N.W. 104 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1887)
Rogers v. Ludlow Manufacturing Co.
11 N.E. 77 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)
Holden v. Fitchburg Railroad
129 Mass. 268 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)