Miller v. Coffin

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Miller v. Coffin

36 A. 6, 19 R.I. 164, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 97

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedFebruary 18, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 36 A. 6 (Miller v. Coffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Coffin, 36 A. 6, 19 R.I. 164, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 97 (R.I. 1895).

Pincite

Opinions

We are of the opinion that the bill is demurrable in that it does not aver that the complainants have any existing cause of action which it is necessary or proper that the defendant Coffin as administrator should prosecute in their behalf.

The complainants then amended their bill, and the respondent filed a plea to the amended bill in which he sets out the declaration in the action at law.

The cause was then heard on the sufficiency of the plea. *Page 166 September 16, 1895.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We are of the opinion that the bill is demurrable in that it does not aver that the complainants have any existing cause of action which it is necessary or proper that the defendant Coffin as administrator should prosecute in their behalf.

The complainants then amended their bill, and the respondent filed a plea to the amended bill in which he sets out the declaration in the action at law.

The cause was then heard on the sufficiency of the plea. *Page 166 September 16, 1895.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 A. 6, 19 R.I. 164, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-coffin-ri-1895.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack