Waithaka v. Amazon.com Inc
Opinion
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 BERNARD WAITHAKA, et al., CASE NO. C19-1320-JCC 10 Plaintiffs, 11 MINUTE ORDER v. 12 AMAZON.COM INC., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. 16 Coughenour, United States District Judge: 17 This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff’s second motion for class 18 certification (Dkt. No. 172) is presently before the Court. After reviewing the briefing to date, 19 the Court concludes that supplemental briefing is required to fully understand the “common 20 answers apt to drive the resolution of [this] litigation.” See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 21 U.S. 338, 350 (2011). 22 The Court seeks argument as to why the Massachusetts Wage Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 23 149, § 148 (2009), requires employers to pay employee business expenses, rather than forbids 24 the unlawful wage deductions considered in, for example, Camara v. Att’y Gen., 941 N.E. 2d 25 1118, 1119 (Mass. 2011) (deduction from wages for damages caused by employee), Awuah v. 26 Coverall N. Am., Inc., 952 N.E. 2d 890, 897–901 (Mass. 2011) (various deductions from “wages 1 earned”), DaSilva v. Border Transfer of MA, Inc., 296 F. Supp. 3d 389, 396 (D. Mass. 2017) 2 (deductions from pay for uniforms and damage claims), and Martins v. 3PD, Inc., 2013 WL 3 1230454, slip op. at 1 (D. Mass. 203) (“Under Massachusetts wage law, an employer may not 4 deduct certain expenses from its payment to employees”) (emphasis added). 5 Plaintiffs shall submit a supplementary brief on the issue described above, not exceeding 6 six pages of argument (excluding declarations and exhibits), no later than October 29, 2024. 7 Defendants shall file a response supplementary brief, also not exceeding six pages of argument, 8 no later than November 12, 2024. Plaintiffs may file a reply supplementary brief, not exceeding 9 four pages, no later than November 19, 2024. 10 The Clerk is, therefore, directed to renote the motion to certify the class to November 19, 11 2024. 12 DATED this 15th day of October 2024. 13 Ravi Subramanian 14 Clerk of Court 15 s/Kathleen Albert 16 Deputy Clerk 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Waithaka v. Amazon.com Inc (Waithaka v. Amazon.com Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.