Waithaka v. Amazon.com Inc

W.D. Washington

Waithaka v. Amazon.com Inc

DecidedMay 3, 2024

Docket2:19-cv-01320

StatusUnknown

This text of Waithaka v. Amazon.com Inc (Waithaka v. Amazon.com Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waithaka v. Amazon.com Inc, (W.D. Wash. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 BERNARD WAITHAKA, et al., CASE NO. C19-1320-JCC

10 Plaintiffs, MINUTE ORDER 11 v. 12 AMAZON.COM, INC., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ joint status report (Dkt. No. 163), 16 following the Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari petitions in Carmona v. Domino’s Pizza LLC, 17 No. 23-427, 2024 WL 1706016, slip op. at 1 (U.S. 2024), and Miller v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 18 23-424, 2024 WL 1706098, slip op. at 1 (U.S. 2024). In that report, the parties provide dueling 19 proposals for a path forward in this putative class action. (See generally Dkt. No. 163). At issue 20 is to what extent the stay in this matter, (Dkt. No. 153 at 1), should be lifted. (See generally Dkt. 21 No. 163.) After reviewing the joint status report, the Court concludes it is now appropriate to lift 22 the stay in its entirety. 23 To assist the Court in formulating a scheduling order for anticipated concurrent renewed 24 motions for class certification and to compel arbitration, the parties are DIRECTED to meet and 25 confer and provide the Court with a supplemental joint status report containing a proposed 26 1 revised case management schedule, through class certification. This supplement shall be filed 2 with the Court no later than May 10, 2024. 3 In the meantime, the stay remains in effect. The Court expects to lift it when it enters a 4 revised case management order. To the extent a party wishes that the Court consider a motion 5 previously struck by the Court, (see Dkt. No. 155 at 2), they must so renew that motion but need 6 not refile supporting declarations. They can rely on previously filed declarations (with references 7 to their location on the docket, e.g., Dkt. No. ___ at ___). 8 9 DATED this 3rd day of May 2024. 10 Ravi Subramanian 11 Clerk of Court 12 s/Kathleen Albert 13 Deputy Clerk 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 BERNARD WAITHAKA, et al., CASE NO. C19-1320-JCC

10 Plaintiffs, MINUTE ORDER 11 v. 12 AMAZON.COM, INC., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ joint status report (Dkt. No. 163), 16 following the Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari petitions in Carmona v. Domino’s Pizza LLC, 17 No. 23-427, 2024 WL 1706016, slip op. at 1 (U.S. 2024), and Miller v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 18 23-424, 2024 WL 1706098, slip op. at 1 (U.S. 2024). In that report, the parties provide dueling 19 proposals for a path forward in this putative class action. (See generally Dkt. No. 163). At issue 20 is to what extent the stay in this matter, (Dkt. No. 153 at 1), should be lifted. (See generally Dkt. 21 No. 163.) After reviewing the joint status report, the Court concludes it is now appropriate to lift 22 the stay in its entirety. 23 To assist the Court in formulating a scheduling order for anticipated concurrent renewed 24 motions for class certification and to compel arbitration, the parties are DIRECTED to meet and 25 confer and provide the Court with a supplemental joint status report containing a proposed 26 1 revised case management schedule, through class certification. This supplement shall be filed 2 with the Court no later than May 10, 2024. 3 In the meantime, the stay remains in effect. The Court expects to lift it when it enters a 4 revised case management order. To the extent a party wishes that the Court consider a motion 5 previously struck by the Court, (see Dkt. No. 155 at 2), they must so renew that motion but need 6 not refile supporting declarations. They can rely on previously filed declarations (with references 7 to their location on the docket, e.g., Dkt. No. ___ at ___). 8 9 DATED this 3rd day of May 2024. 10 Ravi Subramanian 11 Clerk of Court 12 s/Kathleen Albert 13 Deputy Clerk 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Waithaka v. Amazon.com Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waithaka-v-amazoncom-inc-wawd-2024.