Wagner v. Roche Laboratories

704 N.E.2d 256, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1459, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 32
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wagner v. Roche Laboratories. Read the opinion of the Court — 77 Ohio St. 3d 116
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 8, 1999·No. 98-104·Published

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-93-277. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County. On January 6, 1999, appellees filed a designation of John Winter, an attorney who is not admitted to practice in Ohio, as counsel of record in this case. Whereas John Winter has not complied with the pro hac vice requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. 1(2), and has not been granted leave to appear pro hac vice in this case, he is not permitted to file pleadings, memoranda, briefs, or documents other than those required to perfect an appeal, or to participate in oral argument. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellees’ designation of John Winter as counsel of record be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wagner v. Roche Laboratories, 704 N.E.2d 256, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1459, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 32 (Ohio 1999).

704 N.E.2d 256 (Wagner v. Roche Laboratories) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.