Wagner v. Roche Laboratories

661 N.E.2d 755, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1406
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 6, 1996
Docket95-1209
StatusPublished

This text of 661 N.E.2d 755 (Wagner v. Roche Laboratories) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wagner v. Roche Laboratories, 661 N.E.2d 755, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1406 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

Lucas County, Nos. L-93-187 and L-93-277. On motion for admission pro hac vice of John Winter by Irene Keyse-Walker. Motion granted.

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
661 N.E.2d 755, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagner-v-roche-laboratories-ohio-1996.