Wagner v. Roche Laboratories

704 N.E.2d 256, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1459, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 32
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 8, 1999
Docket98-104
StatusPublished

This text of 704 N.E.2d 256 (Wagner v. Roche Laboratories) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wagner v. Roche Laboratories, 704 N.E.2d 256, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1459, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 32 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-93-277. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County. On January 6, 1999, appellees filed a designation of John Winter, an attorney who is not admitted to practice in Ohio, as counsel of record in this case. Whereas John Winter has not complied with the pro hac vice requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. 1(2), and has not been granted leave to appear pro hac vice in this case, he is not permitted to file pleadings, memoranda, briefs, or documents other than those required to perfect an appeal, or to participate in oral argument. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellees’ designation of John Winter as counsel of record be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
704 N.E.2d 256, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1459, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagner-v-roche-laboratories-ohio-1999.