Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wade v. State

Wade v. State

829 So. 2d 965, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15672, 2002 WL 31422941
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wade v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 751 So. 2d 669 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 2002·No. No. 4D02-3132·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse for re-sentencing in case no. 97-15756 because of the improper inclusion of case no. 96-19400 offenses as prior convictions on the case no. 97-15756 score-sheet. Thorp v. State, 555 So.2d 362 (Fla.1990). In addition the scoresheets in both of the above cases should be corrected by deleting six points for a release program violations which were improperly added to each scoresheet. Williams v. State, 680 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Also, the state concedes that the scoresheet in case no. 96-19400 should only have included ninety-one points, not ninety-two, for appellant’s level nine offense.

STONE, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade v. State, 829 So. 2d 965, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15672, 2002 WL 31422941 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

829 So. 2d 965 (Wade v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
680 So. 2d 532 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Thorp v. State
555 So. 2d 362 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)