Wade v. State

812 So. 2d 600, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4566, 2002 WL 518524
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 8, 2002
DocketNo. 1D00-4578
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 812 So. 2d 600 (Wade v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wade v. State, 812 So. 2d 600, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4566, 2002 WL 518524 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine, but we do so without prejudice to his right to raise his claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. We express no view as to the merits of such a motion should one be filed.

BOOTH, MINER and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jeffrey R. Nolley v. State of Florida
237 So. 3d 469 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
812 So. 2d 600, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4566, 2002 WL 518524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wade-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.