Wade v. State

812 So. 2d 600, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4566, 2002 WL 518524
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 8, 2002·No. No. 1D00-4578·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine, but we do so without prejudice to his right to raise his claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. We express no view as to the merits of such a motion should one be filed.

BOOTH, MINER and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade v. State, 812 So. 2d 600, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4566, 2002 WL 518524 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

812 So. 2d 600 (Wade v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jeffrey R. Nolley v. State of Florida
237 So. 3d 469 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)