Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wade v. State

Wade v. State

488 So. 2d 99, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 849, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7165
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 9, 1986
DocketNo. AY-285
StatusPublished

This text of 488 So. 2d 99 (Wade v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wade v. State, 488 So. 2d 99, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 849, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7165 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon reconsideration pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of Florida we apply the rule in Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985), and affirm the trial court’s departure from the presumptive sentencing guidelines.

Although, in this case, both valid and invalid reasons for departure were given, the State has demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that the absence of the invalid reasons would not have affected the departure sentence. Accordingly, we affirm.

BOOTH, C.J., SHIVERS, J., and TILLMAN PEARSON (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hankey v. State
485 So. 2d 827 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Albritton v. State
476 So. 2d 158 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
State v. Mischler
488 So. 2d 523 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
State v. Cote
487 So. 2d 1039 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 So. 2d 99, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 849, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wade-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.