Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wade v. State

Wade v. State

488 So. 2d 99, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 849, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7165
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wade v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1057 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 1986·No. No. AY-285·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon reconsideration pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of Florida we apply the rule in Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985), and affirm the trial court’s departure from the presumptive sentencing guidelines.

Although, in this case, both valid and invalid reasons for departure were given, the State has demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that the absence of the invalid reasons would not have affected the departure sentence. Accordingly, we affirm.

BOOTH, C.J., SHIVERS, J., and TILLMAN PEARSON (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade v. State, 488 So. 2d 99, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 849, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7165 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

488 So. 2d 99 (Wade v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hankey v. State
485 So. 2d 827 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Albritton v. State
476 So. 2d 158 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
State v. Mischler
488 So. 2d 523 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
State v. Cote
487 So. 2d 1039 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)