W. P. Fuller & Co. v. Chatham

53 Cal. App. 800
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 20, 1921
DocketCiv. No. 3812
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 Cal. App. 800 (W. P. Fuller & Co. v. Chatham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
W. P. Fuller & Co. v. Chatham, 53 Cal. App. 800 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

LANGDON, P. J.

This is an appeal by the sureties on a contractor’s bond from a judgment in favor of a material-man.

The decision of the superior court was based on the case of General Electric Co. v. American Bonding Co., 180 Cal. 675, [182 Pac. 444].

[1] After a very careful examination of the record and briefs filed in the instant case, we believe it is not distinguishable from the General Electric Company case, supra; but, on the contrary, we are of the opinion that the aforementioned ease is directly in point under the facts of the present case. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 15, 1921.

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forderer Cornice Works v. Chatham
54 Cal. App. 796 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 Cal. App. 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/w-p-fuller-co-v-chatham-calctapp-1921.