Forderer Cornice Works v. Chatham

202 P. 1117, 54 Cal. App. 796, 1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 667
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 14, 1921
DocketCiv. No. 3958.
StatusPublished

This text of 202 P. 1117 (Forderer Cornice Works v. Chatham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forderer Cornice Works v. Chatham, 202 P. 1117, 54 Cal. App. 796, 1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 667 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

This is an appeal by the sureties on a contractor's bond from a judgment in favor of a materialman. The case is parallel in all of its facts with the case entitled W. P. Fuller Co. v.Chatham et al., 53. Cal.App. 800 [200 P. 293]. A petition to have that case heard and determined by the supreme court was by that court denied September 15, 1921.

Since this case was filed, the Fuller case was heard and determined on appeal. Counsel for appellants have courteously called to our attention the above facts.

On the authority of the Fuller case the judgment is affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Langdon, P. J., concurred.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fuller Co. v. Chatham
200 P. 293 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 P. 1117, 54 Cal. App. 796, 1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forderer-cornice-works-v-chatham-calctapp-1921.