Fuller Co. v. Chatham

200 P. 293, 53 Cal. App. 800
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 20, 1921
DocketCiv. No. 3812.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 200 P. 293 (Fuller Co. v. Chatham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuller Co. v. Chatham, 200 P. 293, 53 Cal. App. 800 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

This is an appeal by the sureties on a contractor's bond from a judgment in favor of a materialman.

The decision of the superior court was based on the case ofGeneral Electric Co. v. American Bonding Co., 180 Cal. 675, [182 P. 444].

[1] After a very careful examination of the record and briefs filed in the instant case, we believe it is not distinguishable from the General Electric Company case, supra; but, on the contrary, we are of the opinion that the aforementioned case is directly in point under the facts of the present case. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 15, 1921.

All the Justices concurred. *Page 801

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forderer Cornice Works v. Chatham
202 P. 1117 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 P. 293, 53 Cal. App. 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-co-v-chatham-calctapp-1921.