Fuller Co. v. Chatham

200 P. 293, 53 Cal. App. 800
California Court of Appeal·Decided July 20, 1921·No. Civ. No. 3812.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

This is an appeal by the sureties on a contractor's bond from a judgment in favor of a materialman.

The decision of the superior court was based on the case ofGeneral Electric Co. v. American Bonding Co., 180 Cal. 675, [182 P. 444].

[1] After a very careful examination of the record and briefs filed in the instant case, we believe it is not distinguishable from the General Electric Company case, supra; but, on the contrary, we are of the opinion that the aforementioned case is directly in point under the facts of the present case. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 15, 1921.

All the Justices concurred. *Page 801

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fuller Co. v. Chatham, 200 P. 293, 53 Cal. App. 800 (Cal. Ct. App. 1921).

200 P. 293 (Fuller Co. v. Chatham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Forderer Cornice Works v. Chatham
202 P. 1117 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)