Vision Contracting v. Geter

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedMay 11, 2016
Docket2016-UP-200
StatusUnpublished

This text of Vision Contracting v. Geter (Vision Contracting v. Geter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vision Contracting v. Geter, (S.C. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Vision Contracting, LLC, Respondent,

v.

Rosiland Geter, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002584

Appeal From Spartanburg County Gordon G. Cooper, Master-in-Equity

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-200 Submitted February 1, 2016 – Filed May 11, 2016

AFFIRMED

Thomas Alexander Belenchia and Thomas Camden Shealy, of A Business Law Firm, of Spartanburg, for Appellant.

George Brandt, III, of Henderson Brandt & Vieth, PA, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Cohen's Drywall Co. v. Sea Spray Homes, LLC, 374 S.C. 195, 198, 648 S.E.2d 598, 599 (2007) ("The foreclosure of a mechanics' lien is an action at law."); id. at 198, 648 S.E.2d at 599-600 ("In an action at law, tried without a jury, an appellate court will not disturb the trial court's findings of fact unless they are wholly unsupported by the evidence or unless it clearly appears the findings are controlled by an error of law."); Ferguson Fire & Fabrication, Inc. v. Preferred Fire Prot., L.L.C., 409 S.C. 331, 343, 762 S.E.2d 561, 567 (2014) ("We are not at liberty, under the guise of construction, to alter the plain language of [a] statute by adding words which the Legislature saw fit not to include." (alteration in original) (quoting Shelley Constr. Co. v. Sea Garden Homes, Inc., 287 S.C. 24, 28, 336 S.E.2d 488, 491 (Ct. App. 1985))); id. ("Our duty is to apply the statute according to its own terms." (quoting Shelley Constr., 287 S.C. at 29, 336 S.E.2d at 491)); Preferred Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Royal Garden Resort, 301 S.C. 1, 3, 389 S.E.2d 853, 854 (1990) ("A mechanic's lien arises, inchoate, when labor is performed or material furnished."); Ferguson Fire, 409 S.C. at 340, 762 S.E.2d at 565 ("In South Carolina, mechanics' liens are purely statutory and may be acquired and enforced only in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the statutes creating them."); Butler Contracting, Inc. v. Court St., LLC, 369 S.C. 121, 130, 631 S.E.2d 252, 257 (2006) ("A mechanic's lien is purely statutory. Therefore, the requirements of the statute must be strictly followed."); S.C. Code Ann. § 29-5-90 (2007) ("[A] lien shall be dissolved unless the person desiring to avail himself thereof, within ninety days after he ceases to labor on . . . such building or structure, serves upon the owner . . . and files in the office of the register of deeds . . . of the county in which the building or structure is situated a statement of a just and true account of the amount due him, with all just credits given, together with a description of the property intended to be covered by the lien sufficiently accurate for identification, with the name of the owner of the property . . . ."); S.C. Code Ann. § 29-5-120(A) (Supp. 2015) ("Unless a suit for enforcing the lien is commenced and notice of pendency of the action is filed within six months after the person desiring to avail himself of it ceases to labor on or furnish labor or material for the building or structure, the lien must be dissolved."); Butler, 369 S.C. at 129, 631 S.E.2d at 256 ("[I]f [a contractor] fails to take any one of these steps, the lien against the property is dissolved pursuant to Sections 29-5-90 and 25-9-120.").

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, LOCKEMY, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen's Drywall Co. v. Sea Spray Homes, LLC
648 S.E.2d 598 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2007)
Shelley Construction Co. v. Sea Garden Homes, Inc.
336 S.E.2d 488 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1985)
PREFERRED SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Royal Garden Resort, Inc.
389 S.E.2d 853 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1990)
Butler Contracting, Inc. v. Court Street, LLC
631 S.E.2d 252 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2006)
Ferguson Fire & Fabrication, Inc. v. Preferred Fire Protection, L.L.C.
762 S.E.2d 561 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Vision Contracting v. Geter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vision-contracting-v-geter-scctapp-2016.