Villines v. Harris

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Villines v. Harris

204 S.W.3d 520, 361 Ark. 111

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 3, 2005

Docket04-568

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 204 S.W.3d 520 (Villines v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Villines v. Harris, 204 S.W.3d 520, 361 Ark. 111 (Ark. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Floyd Villines, III, appeals from “all orders entered in this case” involving alleged improper assessment of real property taxes in Pulaski County. However, in violation of Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4~2(a)(8), the notice of appeal is not included in the Addendum. Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court finds that the Addendum is deficient, and the appellant is granted fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order within which to file an amended Addendum. It is a practical impossibility for seven justices to examine a single transcript filed with this court. City of Dover v. City of Russellville, 351 Ark. 557, 95 S.W.3d 808 (2003). Further, this court may affirm the judgment under Ark. R. Sup. Ct. 4-2(b) (3) if an amended Addendum is not filed within the fifteen days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Floyd Villines, III, appeals from “all orders entered in this case” involving alleged improper assessment of real property taxes in Pulaski County. However, in violation of Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4~2(a)(8), the notice of appeal is not included in the Addendum. Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court finds that the Addendum is deficient, and the appellant is granted fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order within which to file an amended Addendum. It is a practical impossibility for seven justices to examine a single transcript filed with this court. City of Dover v. City of Russellville, 351 Ark. 557, 95 S.W.3d 808 (2003). Further, this court may affirm the judgment under Ark. R. Sup. Ct. 4-2(b) (3) if an amended Addendum is not filed within the fifteen days.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 S.W.3d 520, 361 Ark. 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/villines-v-harris-ark-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack