Villines v. Harris

204 S.W.3d 520, 361 Ark. 111
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided March 3, 2005·No. 04-568·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Floyd Villines, III, appeals from “all orders entered in this case” involving alleged improper assessment of real property taxes in Pulaski County. However, in violation of Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4~2(a)(8), the notice of appeal is not included in the Addendum. Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court finds that the Addendum is deficient, and the appellant is granted fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order within which to file an amended Addendum. It is a practical impossibility for seven justices to examine a single transcript filed with this court. City of Dover v. City of Russellville, 351 Ark. 557, 95 S.W.3d 808 (2003). Further, this court may affirm the judgment under Ark. R. Sup. Ct. 4-2(b) (3) if an amended Addendum is not filed within the fifteen days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Villines v. Harris, 204 S.W.3d 520, 361 Ark. 111 (Ark. 2005).

204 S.W.3d 520 (Villines v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wallace v. West Fraser South, Inc.
216 S.W.3d 117 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2005)
City of Dover v. City of Russellville
213 S.W.3d 1 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2005)
Second Injury Fund v. Sedgwick James of Arkansas
206 S.W.3d 894 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2005)