Vigil v. Social Security Administration

D. New Mexico

Vigil v. Social Security Administration

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided July 7, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-00100·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MARCUS VIGIL, Plaintiff, VS. Civ. No. 21-100 RB/JFR KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar, filed June 21, 2022. (Doc. 35.) Objections were due by no later than July 5, 2022. The parties have not filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10th Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 35) are adopted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Opposed Motion to Reverse and/or Remand (Doc. 28) is GRANTED. — SENIOR USS. TRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MARCUS VIGIL, Plaintiff, VS. Civ. No. 21-100 RB/JFR KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar, filed June 21, 2022. (Doc. 35.) Objections were due by no later than July 5, 2022. The parties have not filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10th Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 35) are adopted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Opposed Motion to Reverse and/or Remand (Doc. 28) is GRANTED. — SENIOR USS. TRICT JUDGE

Vigil v. Social Security Administration, (D.N.M. 2022).

Pincite

Vigil v. Social Security Administration (Vigil v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related