Vigil v. Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO AMANDA MARIE V., Plaintiff, VS. Case No. 1:24-cv-00089-KRS MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER On consideration of Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Remand to Agency pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (ECF No. 17), the Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision in this matter under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and REMANDS the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.! See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993).
bse et ati ae UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Submitted by: /s/Michelle C. Verdis MICHELLE C. VERDIS ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
' The Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 58.
Approved by:
/s/ electronically approved 7/9/2024 LAURA JOELLEN JOHNSON ARMSTRONG JOHNSON LAW, LLC
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vigil v. Social Security Administration (Vigil v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.