Vetter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
This text of 423 So. 2d 991 (Vetter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Russell VETTER, Appellant,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward A. Perse, Miami, Bernard Butts, Hialeah, for appellant.
Talburt, Kubicki & Bradley and Betsy E. Hartley and Jon D. Derrevere, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment below is affirmed on the authority of Indomenico v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 388 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) and State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Kuhn, 374 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). As in Allstate Ins. Co. v. Alvarez, 414 So.2d 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), we acknowledge and certify that this decision is in constitutional direct conflict with Harbach v. New Hampshire Ins. Group, 413 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
423 So. 2d 991, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vetter-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-company-fladistctapp-1982.