State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rauenzahn

Supreme Court of Florida

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rauenzahn

442 So. 2d 217, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3156

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 8, 1983

DocketNo. 63489

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 442 So. 2d 217 (State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rauenzahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rauenzahn, 442 So. 2d 217, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3156 (Fla. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

OVERTON, Justice.

This is a petition to review a decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal reported as State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Rauenzahn, 426 So.2d 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We find direct conflict with Vetter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 423 So.2d 991 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Alvarez, 414 So.2d 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Indomenico v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 388 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Wimpee, 376 So.2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 385 So.2d 762 (Fla.1980); and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Kuhn, 374 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We have resolved this conflict in our decision in New Hampshire Insurance Group v. Harbach, 439 So.2d 1383 (Fla.,1983). For the reasons expressed in that decision, we quash the decision of the district court in the instant case.

It is so ordered.

ALDERMAN, C.J., and BOYD, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OVERTON, Justice.

This is a petition to review a decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal reported as State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Rauenzahn, 426 So.2d 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We find direct conflict with Vetter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 423 So.2d 991 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Alvarez, 414 So.2d 224 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Indomenico v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 388 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Wimpee, 376 So.2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 385 So.2d 762 (Fla.1980); and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Kuhn, 374 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 383 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We have resolved this conflict in our decision in New Hampshire Insurance Group v. Harbach, 439 So.2d 1383 (Fla.,1983). For the reasons expressed in that decision, we quash the decision of the district court in the instant case.

It is so ordered.

ALDERMAN, C.J., and BOYD, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

442 So. 2d 217, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 3156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-fire-casualty-co-v-rauenzahn-fla-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack