Vetter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

439 So. 2d 1387, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 2697
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 20, 1983·No. No. 63137·Published

Opinions

OVERTON, Justice.

This is a petition to review a decision of the Third District Court of, Appeal reported as Vetter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 423 So.2d 991 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The district court certified this case as being in direct conflict with the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Harbach v. New Hampshire Insurance Group, 413 So.2d 1216 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We have resolved this conflict in our decision in New Hampshire Insurance Group v. Harbach, 439 So.2d 1383 (Fla.1983). For the reasons expressed in that decision, we approve the decision of the district court in the instant case.

It is so ordered.

ALDERMAN, C.J., and McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. BOYD, J., dissents with an opinion. ADKINS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vetter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 439 So. 2d 1387, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 2697 (Fla. 1983).

439 So. 2d 1387 (Vetter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vetter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
423 So. 2d 991 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
New Hampshire Ins. Group v. Harbach
439 So. 2d 1383 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Harbach v. New Hampshire Ins. Group
413 So. 2d 1216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)