Ventura v. State

36 So. 3d 128, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5335, 2010 WL 1628766
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ventura v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 973 So. 2d 634
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 23, 2010·No. No. 2D09-1570·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sabino Cruz Ventura appeals an order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We find no merit in Ventura’s claims, and therefore, we affirm. However, we note that although Ventura pleaded guilty to second-degree murder, the judgment form and minutes of the plea hearing inaccurately reflect that he pleaded to second-degree felony murder. We therefore remand with directions to the postconviction court to correct the scrivener’s error which is apparent on the face of the record and which the postconviction court noted in its order of denial. See Stern v. State, 833 So.2d 190, 190 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Affirmed and remanded.

ALTENBERND, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ventura v. State, 36 So. 3d 128, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5335, 2010 WL 1628766 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

36 So. 3d 128 (Ventura v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stern v. State
833 So. 2d 190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)