Stern v. State
This text of 833 So. 2d 190 (Stern v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eliezer STERN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Eliezer Stern, Naples, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The order summarily denying Appellant's motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, is affirmed, but the trial court on remand is directed to correct the scrivener's errors, to which the state's response indicated it had no objection, namely: in the judgment (reflecting that Appellant was found guilty of "sell counterfeit goods," when he was actually charged with, found guilty of, and convicted of vending goods with counterfeit trademarks); in the probation order (reflecting that Appellant entered a plea of guilty/nolo contendere and that he was being placed on probation on counts I-IV, when he pleaded not guilty and the information was amended prior to trial to reflect only one count); and in the disposition sheet (again reflecting four counts instead of one).
KLEIN, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
833 So. 2d 190, 2002 WL 31757976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stern-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.