Ventura v. State
This text of 36 So. 3d 128 (Ventura v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sabino Cruz Ventura appeals an order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We find no merit in Ventura’s claims, and therefore, we affirm. However, we note that although Ventura pleaded guilty to second-degree murder, the judgment form and minutes of the plea hearing inaccurately reflect that he pleaded to second-degree felony murder. We therefore remand with directions to the postconviction court to correct the scrivener’s error which is apparent on the face of the record and which the postconviction court noted in its order of denial. See Stern v. State, 833 So.2d 190, 190 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).
Affirmed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 So. 3d 128, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5335, 2010 WL 1628766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ventura-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.