Velazquez v. State

870 So. 2d 863, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 915, 2004 WL 231462
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 4, 2004·No. No. 3D03-1192·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error that Velazquez’s restitution should be reduced from $ 1,860 to $1,828 to conform to the terms of Velazquez’s plea agreement, we remand with instructions to reduce restitution accordingly. See Garcia v. State, 722 So.2d 905, 907 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (“A plea agreement is a contract and the rules of contract law apply to plea agreements.”); State v. Frazier, 697 So.2d 944, 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (“[T]he state, above all parties, must keep its word.”). We otherwise affirm the order revoking and modifying the terms of Velazquez’s probation.

[864]*864Affirmed in part, remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Velazquez v. State, 870 So. 2d 863, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 915, 2004 WL 231462 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

870 So. 2d 863 (Velazquez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffis v. Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission
57 So. 3d 929 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)