Velazquez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Velazquez v. State

870 So. 2d 863, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 915, 2004 WL 231462

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 4, 2004

DocketNo. 3D03-1192

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 870 So. 2d 863 (Velazquez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Velazquez v. State, 870 So. 2d 863, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 915, 2004 WL 231462 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error that Velazquez’s restitution should be reduced from $ 1,860 to $1,828 to conform to the terms of Velazquez’s plea agreement, we remand with instructions to reduce restitution accordingly. See Garcia v. State, 722 So.2d 905, 907 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (“A plea agreement is a contract and the rules of contract law apply to plea agreements.”); State v. Frazier, 697 So.2d 944, 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (“[T]he state, above all parties, must keep its word.”). We otherwise affirm the order revoking and modifying the terms of Velazquez’s probation.

[864]*864Affirmed in part, remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s proper confession of error that Velazquez’s restitution should be reduced from $ 1,860 to $1,828 to conform to the terms of Velazquez’s plea agreement, we remand with instructions to reduce restitution accordingly. See Garcia v. State, 722 So.2d 905, 907 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (“A plea agreement is a contract and the rules of contract law apply to plea agreements.”); State v. Frazier, 697 So.2d 944, 945 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (“[T]he state, above all parties, must keep its word.”). We otherwise affirm the order revoking and modifying the terms of Velazquez’s probation.

[864]*864Affirmed in part, remanded with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

870 So. 2d 863, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 915, 2004 WL 231462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/velazquez-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack