Vega-Vazquez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Vega-Vazquez v. State

760 So. 2d 290, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7006, 2000 WL 731909

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 9, 2000

DocketNo. 2D98-4424

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 760 So. 2d 290 (Vega-Vazquez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vega-Vazquez v. State, 760 So. 2d 290, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7006, 2000 WL 731909 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

CASANUEVA, Judge.

Arnaldo Vega-Vazquez raises numerous issues in this appeal from his convictions for manslaughter and vehicular homicide. We find only one contention meritorious, which we discuss below. As to the remaining issues, we affirm.

Mr. Vega-Vazquez contends that because only one death resulted from his operation of a motor vehicle, he cannot be adjudicated guilty of both manslaughter and vehicular homicide. The State, citing State v. Chapman, 625 So.2d 838 (Fla.1993), does not take issue with this contention. In Chapman, the supreme court held a single death cannot support convictions for both manslaughter by driving while under the influence and vehicular homicide. See also State v. Cooper, 634 So.2d 1074 (Fla.1994). Accordingly, the vehicular homicide conviction cannot stand.

We affirm his manslaughter conviction, reverse the vehicular homicide conviction, and remand with instructions for the circuit court to strike the latter. Because Mr. Vega-Vazquez was not sentenced for vehicular homicide, nor was it included on [291]*291his guidelines scoresheet, we affirm his sentence.

NORTHCUTT, A.C.J., and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CASANUEVA, Judge.

Arnaldo Vega-Vazquez raises numerous issues in this appeal from his convictions for manslaughter and vehicular homicide. We find only one contention meritorious, which we discuss below. As to the remaining issues, we affirm.

Mr. Vega-Vazquez contends that because only one death resulted from his operation of a motor vehicle, he cannot be adjudicated guilty of both manslaughter and vehicular homicide. The State, citing State v. Chapman, 625 So.2d 838 (Fla.1993), does not take issue with this contention. In Chapman, the supreme court held a single death cannot support convictions for both manslaughter by driving while under the influence and vehicular homicide. See also State v. Cooper, 634 So.2d 1074 (Fla.1994). Accordingly, the vehicular homicide conviction cannot stand.

We affirm his manslaughter conviction, reverse the vehicular homicide conviction, and remand with instructions for the circuit court to strike the latter. Because Mr. Vega-Vazquez was not sentenced for vehicular homicide, nor was it included on [291]*291his guidelines scoresheet, we affirm his sentence.

NORTHCUTT, A.C.J., and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

760 So. 2d 290, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7006, 2000 WL 731909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vega-vazquez-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack