Holmes v. State

778 So. 2d 534, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2365, 2001 WL 209062
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holmes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 710 So. 2d 651
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 2001·No. No. 1D99-4462·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Holmes appeals his conviction for DUI manslaughter and vehicular homicide. We affirm the DUI manslaughter conviction, and remand to the trial court to dismiss the conviction for vehicular homicide. State v. Chapman, 625 So.2d 838 (Fla.1993). Because Appellant was not sentenced for vehicular homicide and that conviction is not included on his guidelines scoresheet, we affirm his sentence. See Vega-Vazquez v. State, 760 So.2d 290 (Fla.2d DCA2000).

AFFIRMED in part,, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.

BOOTH, DAVIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes v. State, 778 So. 2d 534, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2365, 2001 WL 209062 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

778 So. 2d 534 (Holmes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Chapman
625 So. 2d 838 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Vega-Vazquez v. State
760 So. 2d 290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)