State v. Cooper

634 So. 2d 1074, 1994 WL 113399
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 7, 1994
Docket82034
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 634 So. 2d 1074 (State v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cooper, 634 So. 2d 1074, 1994 WL 113399 (Fla. 1994).

Opinion

634 So.2d 1074 (1994)

STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Harold COOPER, Respondent.

No. 82034.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 7, 1994.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Barbara Arlene Fink, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for petitioner.

Richard G. Canina of the Law Firm of Mitchell & Canina, P.A., Melbourne, for respondent.

McDONALD, Justice.

We review Cooper v. State, 621 So.2d 729, 732 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), because the district court certified the following question to be of great public importance:

WHETHER A DEFENDANT CAN BE CONVICTED AND SENTENCED FOR BOTH THE OFFENSE OF DUI MANSLAUGHTER AND THE OFFENSE OF DRIVING WHILE LICENSE SUSPENDED AND CARELESSLY OR NEGLIGENTLY CAUSING THE DEATH OF ANOTHER HUMAN BEING WHERE THERE IS ONLY A SINGLE DEATH.

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

The district court properly ruled that there can be but one penalty imposed for causing the death of a single victim. State v. Chapman, 625 So.2d 838 (Fla. 1993); Houser v. State, 474 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1985). It is entirely appropriate to convict a person *1075 of both DUI manslaughter and driving while license is suspended, but it is inappropriate to enhance the degree of both crimes by using a single homicide. Cooper was convicted of violating subsection 316.193(3)(c)(3), Florida Statutes (1991), a second-degree felony. He may also be convicted of violating subsection 322.34(1) or (2), Florida Statutes (1991), but not subsection 322.34(3) because he has already been punished for the death by the DUI manslaughter conviction.

We adopt the rationale and approve the decision of the district court of appeal.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

STATE OF FLORIDA v. LEX LUGARD EUGENE
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
Michael Deshon Daniel v. State of Florida
271 So. 3d 1214 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
LORENZO A. MARTINEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA
251 So. 3d 306 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Marsh v. State
253 So. 3d 674 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
ELIZABETH FRANCES MARSH v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
McCullough v. State
230 So. 3d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Kenneth T. Linton v. State
212 So. 3d 1100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
David J. Prestano v. State
210 So. 3d 772 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Julius Junior Crusaw v. State of Florida
195 So. 3d 422 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Kopson v. State
125 So. 3d 169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Lott v. State
74 So. 3d 556 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Kirkland v. State
41 So. 3d 1048 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Carney v. State
17 So. 3d 348 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Kelly v. State
987 So. 2d 1237 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Carvalho v. State
932 So. 2d 644 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Thomas v. State
837 So. 2d 443 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Green v. State
828 So. 2d 462 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Lawrence v. State
801 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Pelham v. State
771 So. 2d 1254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
634 So. 2d 1074, 1994 WL 113399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cooper-fla-1994.