Home/D.C. Circuit/V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. And Ercona Corporation v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney General of the United States

V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. And Ercona Corporation v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney General of the United States

384 F.2d 979
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 13, 1967
Docket20351
StatusPublished
Cited by75 cases

This text of 384 F.2d 979 (V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. And Ercona Corporation v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney General of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. And Ercona Corporation v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney General of the United States, 384 F.2d 979 (D.C. Cir. 1967).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.

On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the order of the District Court, appealed from in this cause be, and it is hereby, affirmed for the reasons stated in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, D.D.C., 40 F.R.D. 318 (1966).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ripple Labs Inc.
S.D. New York, 2022
United States ex rel. Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
254 F.R.D. 35 (D. Massachusetts, 2008)
Alpha I, L.P. v. United States
83 Fed. Cl. 279 (Federal Claims, 2008)
Miller v. Mehltretter
478 F. Supp. 2d 415 (W.D. New York, 2007)
Vons Companies, Inc. v. United States
51 Fed. Cl. 1 (Federal Claims, 2001)
Nagy v. Baltimore Life Insurance
49 F. Supp. 2d 822 (D. Maryland, 1999)
Abramson v. United States
39 Fed. Cl. 290 (Federal Claims, 1997)
Yang You Yi v. Reno
157 F.R.D. 625 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1994)
Castle v. Jallah
142 F.R.D. 618 (E.D. Virginia, 1992)
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Diamond
137 F.R.D. 634 (S.D. New York, 1991)
Gomez v. City of Nashua
126 F.R.D. 432 (D. New Hampshire, 1989)
Bigelow v. District of Columbia
122 F.R.D. 111 (District of Columbia, 1988)
United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.
123 F.R.D. 3 (W.D. New York, 1988)
Sidney M. Wolfe v. Department of Health and Human Services
839 F.2d 768 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)
Cna Financial Corporation v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor
830 F.2d 1132 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
CACI Field Services, Inc. v. United States
34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,339 (Court of Claims, 1987)
T. Marzetti Co. v. Doyle
523 N.E.2d 347 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1987)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
111 F.R.D. 385 (N.D. Illinois, 1986)
N.O., M.T., J.O., E.I., D.V., J.D., E.H. v. Callahan
110 F.R.D. 637 (D. Massachusetts, 1986)
Lundy v. Interfirst Corp.
105 F.R.D. 499 (District of Columbia, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
384 F.2d 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/veb-carl-zeiss-jena-steelmasters-inc-and-ercona-corporation-v-cadc-1967.