Vazquez v. State

948 So. 2d 930, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1778, 2007 WL 465642
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vazquez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 953 So. 2d 569
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 14, 2007·No. No. 3D06-2320·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After his Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief was denied by the trial court in Orange County, the defendant sought habeas corpus in Miami-Dade County, where he is incarcerated. See Vazquez v. State, 826 So.2d 320 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)(table). As the court correctly ruled below, an action like this one, which attacks the legality of the conviction and sentence rather than the circumstances of confinement, cannot be maintained in the place of imprisonment. See Murray v. Regier, 872 So.2d 217 (Fla.2002); Johnson v. State, 947 So.2d 1192 (Fla. 3d DCA [931]*9312007); Perez v. McDonough, 946 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Vale v. State, 946 So.2d 104 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Calloway v. State, 699 So.2d 849 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vazquez v. State, 948 So. 2d 930, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1778, 2007 WL 465642 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

948 So. 2d 930 (Vazquez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Calloway v. State
699 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Murray v. Regier
872 So. 2d 217 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Johnson v. State
947 So. 2d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Perez v. McDonough
946 So. 2d 618 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Vale v. State
946 So. 2d 104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)