Calloway v. State
This text of 699 So. 2d 849 (Calloway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Samuel CALLOWAY, Petitioner,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Samuel Calloway, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Mark Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before JORGENSON, GERSTEN and GREEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the denial of his Petition for Habeas Corpus. We dismiss this appeal. Defendant candidly admits in his motion that he was convicted in the seventeenth judicial circuit in 1993, and that he can no longer file a timely motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850 in that circuit. Defendant further admits that he filed his Petition for Habeas Corpus in Dade County in an attempt to avoid the limitations period imposed by rule 3.850. A petition for habeas corpus cannot be used to circumvent the two-year period for filing motions for postconviction relief. Scott v. Dugger, 604 So.2d 465, 470 (Fla.1992); Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So.2d 889, 891-92 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
A more significant reason for our dismissal of this appeal, however, is that the trial court in Dade County was without jurisdiction *850 to entertain defendant's petition. "[A] circuit court has no jurisdiction to review the legality of a conviction in another circuit...." State v. Broom, 523 So.2d 639, 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
699 So. 2d 849, 1997 WL 600571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calloway-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.