Birdsong v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Birdsong v. State

732 So. 2d 1208, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6421, 1999 WL 312554

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 19, 1999

DocketNos. 98-3325, 98-1935

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 732 So. 2d 1208 (Birdsong v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Birdsong v. State, 732 So. 2d 1208, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6421, 1999 WL 312554 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of defendant’s motion for postconviction relief, and deny both his Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis and his Petition for Writ of Mandamus. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b) (imposing two-year limitation on seeking postcon-viction relief in noncapital case unless facts on which claim is predicated were unknown to movant or movant’s attorney and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence); see also Calloway v. State, 699 So.2d 849 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (holding that habeas petition cannot be used to circumvent the limitations period imposed by rule 3.850); Smith v. State, 506 So.2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (holding that laches may bar claim for postconviction relief).

Denial of Motion for Postconviction relief, affirmed; Petitions for Writ of Error Coram Nobis and Mandamus, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of defendant’s motion for postconviction relief, and deny both his Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis and his Petition for Writ of Mandamus. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b) (imposing two-year limitation on seeking postcon-viction relief in noncapital case unless facts on which claim is predicated were unknown to movant or movant’s attorney and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence); see also Calloway v. State, 699 So.2d 849 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (holding that habeas petition cannot be used to circumvent the limitations period imposed by rule 3.850); Smith v. State, 506 So.2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (holding that laches may bar claim for postconviction relief).

Denial of Motion for Postconviction relief, affirmed; Petitions for Writ of Error Coram Nobis and Mandamus, denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

732 So. 2d 1208, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6421, 1999 WL 312554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birdsong-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack