Vale v. State
This text of 946 So. 2d 104 (Vale v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Edward VALE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Edward Vale, Madison, Pro Se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Edward J. Vale appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in the circuit court of Brevard County. When a petitioner, such as Vale, attacks the validity of the conviction by raising issues relating to the trial, or to the propriety of a plea, jurisdiction for habeas proceedings rests with the trial court that imposed the sentence and rendered the judgment of conviction. Collins v. State, 859 So.2d 1244, 1245-46 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). As Vale's petition for writ of habeas corpus attacked his Seminole County conviction, his habeas proceeding should have been filed with that court. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of Vale's habeas corpus petition without prejudice to refile in Seminole County.
AFFIRMED.
THOMPSON, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
946 So. 2d 104, 2007 WL 28286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vale-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.