Vaughn v. State

407 S.W.3d 695, 2013 WL 4804985, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1030
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 10, 2013·No. No. ED 99365·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carlos Vaughn (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying without an evidentia-ry hearing his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant asserts that the motion court erred in denying his claim that counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object when the prosecutor argued facts outside the record in his rebuttal closing argument.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vaughn v. State, 407 S.W.3d 695, 2013 WL 4804985, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1030 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

407 S.W.3d 695 (Vaughn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.